a) To provide compressive strength

b) To handle tensile pressure and prevent cracking

c) To reduce construction costs

d) To replace the need for concrete

a) TMT Bars

b) Mild Steel Bars (MS Bars)

c) Stainless Steel Rebars

d) Epoxy-Coated Rebars

a) Smooth surface

b) High flexibility and ribbed surface

c) Epoxy coating for corrosion resistance

d) Non-metallic composition

a) They are the most affordable option.

b) They have a tough outer layer and a soft core, providing high ductility.

c) They are lightweight and non-corrosive.

d) They are easy to cut and weld.

a) Mild Steel Bars

b) Epoxy-Coated Rebars

c) TMT Bars

d) Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Rebars

a) They are the most affordable option.

b) They offer exceptional rust and corrosion resistance.

c) They have a ribbed surface for superior bonding.

d) They are lightweight and electrically non-conductive.

a) High tensile strength

b) Corrosion resistance and lightweight design

c) Superior bonding with concrete

d) Cost-effective usage in high-rise buildings

a) Fe 415

b) Fe 500

c) Fe 550

d) Fe 600

a) Due to the high cost of other materials

b) To resist high salinity and moisture in coastal climates

c) For their lightweight properties

d) To support high-rise construction

a) Stainless Steel Rebars

b) Fe 500 Grade TMT Bars

c) Epoxy-Coated Rebars

d) Mild Steel Bars

a) TMT Bars

b) Stainless Steel Rebars

c) Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Rebars

d) Mild Steel Bars

a) Sariya

b) Loha Bars

c) Kamba

d) Gahan

a) To increase the lifespan of the bars

b) To guarantee quality and reliability

c) To make the bars easier to weld

d) To reduce costs

a) Using TMT bars instead of MS bars

b) Ignoring corrosion resistance

c) Choosing high-ductility bars

d) Overlooking tensile strength

a) The lowest cost materials available

b) Local terminology and supplier reputation

c) Structural needs, environmental conditions, and regional preferences

d) Lightweight and non-metallic rebars